4.8 Article

Prediction of photothermal phase signatures from arbitrary plasmonic nanoparticles and experimental verification

Journal

LIGHT-SCIENCE & APPLICATIONS
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CHINESE ACAD SCIENCES, CHANGCHUN INST OPTICS FINE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2015.95

Keywords

digital holographic microscopy; interferometric imaging; nanoparticles; phase measurement; plasmonics

Categories

Funding

  1. FP7 Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (CIG) [303559]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a new approach for predicting spatial phase signals originating from photothermally excited metallic nanoparticles of arbitrary shapes and sizes. The heat emitted from such a nanoparticle affects the measured optical phase signal via changes in both the refractive index and thickness of the nanoparticle surroundings. Because these particles can be bio-functionalized to bind certain biological cell components, they can be used for biomedical imaging with molecular specificity, as new nanoscopy labels, and for photothermal therapy. Predicting the ideal nanoparticle parameters requires a model that computes the thermal and phase distributions around the particle, thereby enabling more efficient phase imaging of plasmonic nanoparticles and avoiding trial-and-error experiments while using unsuitable nanoparticles. The proposed nonlinear model is the first to enable the prediction of phase signatures from nanoparticles with arbitrary parameters. The model is based on a finite-volume method for geometry discretization and an implicit backward Euler method for solving the transient inhomogeneous heat equation, followed by calculation of the accumulative phase signal. To validate the model, we compared its results with experimental results obtained for gold nanorods of various concentrations, which we acquired using a custom-built wide-field interferometric phase microscopy system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available