4.4 Article

Density functional theory characterization of phosphate and sulfate adsorption on Fe-(hydr)oxide: Reactivity, pH effect, estimation of Gibbs free energies, and topological analysis of hydrogen bonds

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL AND THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 1005, Issue -, Pages 16-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2012.11.002

Keywords

Fe-(hydr)oxide; Phosphate adsorption; Gibbs free energy; Fukui function; Quantum Chemical Topology

Funding

  1. EPM/CIIEN
  2. COLCIENCIAS [1115-4547-21979]
  3. University of Antioquia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding adsorption of phosphate and sulfate on Fe-(hydr)oxide surfaces is important to predict the fate of these anions in wastewater and in the design of systems to remove and recover phosphates. Quantum chemical calculations were used to estimate relative Gibbs free energies of phosphate and sulfate adsorption like inner-sphere and outer-sphere complexes using three different simulated pH conditions (acid, intermediate, and basic). Bidentate binuclear surface complexes presented the most thermodynamically favorable mode of adsorption for both phosphate and sulfate with -94.4 kJ/mol and -62.3 kJ/mol, respectively, at acid pH condition. Topological analysis was done to understand how the Fe-(hydr)oxide surfaces are affected for the different types of adsorption of phosphate and sulfate. A classification of the O-H center dot center dot center dot O hydrogen bonds (HBs) formed in all structures discriminating among the surface functional groups, solvation water molecules, and adsorbed molecules was done by the topological analysis of the electron density. HBs nature is mostly electrostatic which agrees with positive values of the Laplacian. This result indicates the existence of positive cooperative effects among these interactions which confers additional stabilization to the systems. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available