4.6 Article

Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B using nanocrystalline TiO2-zeolite surface composite catalysts: effects of photocatalytic condition on degradation efficiency

Journal

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages 802-809

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1cy00012h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50802034]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [09JJ6101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanocrystalline TiO2-zeolite surface (TZS) composites were prepared by a novel technique, i.e., sol-gel method with the assistance of supercritical pretreatment. The samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and BET surface area analysis. The behavior of TZS in the catalytic degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) dye under UV-light was examined as a function of the pH values in solution, light intensity, irradiation time, TiO2 coating ratio of TZS and its concentration in solution, and initial RhB concentration. The kinetics of photocatalytic RhB degradation was found to follow a pseudo-first-order rate law. It was observed that the presence of the zeolites enhanced the photoefficiency of the titanium dioxide due to synergistic effects of the improved adsorption of RhB with efficient delocalisation of photogenerated electrons and TiO2 photocatalysis. Furthermore, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 was further enhanced by a zeolite support pretreated in supercritical CO2. It is mainly attributed to the fact that TZS has high surface area in comparison with TiO2-zeolite (TZ) composites prepared by the sol-gel method only. The optimal conditions were a concentration of 2 mg L-1 at pH 10 with 32 mW cm(-2) of illumination and a catalyst content of 6 g L-1 for the fastest rate of RhB photocatalytic degradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available