4.2 Review

FISH and chips: the recipe for improved prognostication and outcomes for children with medulloblastoma

Journal

CANCER GENETICS
Volume 204, Issue 11, Pages 577-588

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2011.11.001

Keywords

Medulloblastoma; genomics; subgroups; copy-number alterations; prognosis

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation
  3. National Institute of Health [R01CA48699]
  4. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research/Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapidly evolving genomic technologies have permitted progressively detailed studies of medulloblastoma biology in recent years. These data have increased our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of medulloblastoma, identified prognostic markers, and suggested future avenues for targeted therapy. Although current randomized trials are still stratified based largely on clinical variables, the use of molecular markers is approaching routine use in the clinic. In particular, integrated genomics has uncovered that medulloblastoma comprises four distinct molecular and clinical variants: WNT, sonic hedgehog (SHH), group 3, and group 4. Children with WNT medulloblastoma have improved survival, whereas those with group 3 medulloblastoma have a dismal prognosis. Additionally, integrated genomics has shown that adult medulloblastoma is molecularly and clinically distinct from the childhood variants. Prognostic and predictive markers identified by genomics should drive changes in stratification of treatment protocols for medulloblastoma patients on clinical trials once they can be demonstrated to be reliable, reproducible, and practical. Cases with excellent prognoses (WNT cases) should be considered for therapy de-escalation, whereas those with bleak prognoses (group 3 cases) should be prioritized for experimental therapy. In this review, we will summarize the genomic data published over the past decade and attempt to interpret its prognostic significance, relevance to the clinic, and use in upcoming clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available