4.7 Article

A Melanoma Cell State Distinction Influences Sensitivity to MAPK Pathway Inhibitors

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 4, Issue 7, Pages 816-827

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0424

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [T32GM007753]
  2. NIH
  3. NCI
  4. Melanoma Research Alliance
  5. Starr Cancer Consortium
  6. Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most melanomas harbor oncogenic BRAF(V600) mutations, which constitutively activate the MAPK pathway. Although MAPK pathway inhibitors show clinical benefit in BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma, it remains incompletely understood why 10% to 20% of patients fail to respond. Here, we show that RAF inhibitor-sensitive and inhibitor-resistant BRAF(V600)-mutant melanomas display distinct transcriptional profiles. Whereas most drug-sensitive cell lines and patient biopsies showed high expression and activity of the melanocytic lineage transcription factor MITF, intrinsically resistant cell lines and biopsies displayed low MITF expression but higher levels of NF-kappa B signaling and the receptor tyrosine kinase AXL. In vitro, these MITF-low/ NF-kappa B-high melanomas were resistant to inhibition of RAF and MEK, singly or in combination, and ERK. Moreover, in cell lines, NF-kappa B activation antagonized MITF expression and induced both resistance marker genes and drug resistance. Thus, distinct cell states characterized by MITF or NF-kappa B activity may influence intrinsic resistance to MAPK pathway inhibitors in BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma. SIGNIFICANCE: Although most BRAF(V600)-mutant melanomas are sensitive to RAF and/or MEK inhibitors, a subset fails to respond to such treatment. This study characterizes a transcriptional cell state distinction linked to MITF and NF-kappa B that may modulate intrinsic sensitivity of melanomas to MAPK pathway inhibitors. (C) 2014 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available