4.7 Article

Autophagy Is Critical for Pancreatic Tumor Growth and Progression in Tumors with p53 Alterations

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 4, Issue 8, Pages 905-913

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0362

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01CA157490]
  2. American Cancer Society (ACS) Research Scholar grant [RSG-13-298-01-TBG]
  3. Lustgarten Foundation
  4. SU2C AACR Translational Research Dream Team [SU2C-AACR-DT0509]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is refractory to available therapies. We have previously shown that these tumors have elevated autophagy and that inhibition of autophagy leads to decreased tumor growth. Using an autochthonous model of pancreatic cancer driven by oncogenic Kras and the stochastic LOH of Trp53, we demonstrate that although genetic ablation of autophagy in the pancreas leads to increased tumor initiation, these premalignant lesions are impaired in their ability to progress to invasive cancer, leading to prolonged survival. In addition, mouse pancreatic cancer cell lines with differing p53 status are all sensitive to pharmacologic and genetic inhibition of autophagy. Finally, a mouse preclinical trial using cohorts of genetically characterized patientderived xenografts treated with hydroxychloroquine showed responses across the collection of tumors. Together, our data support the critical role of autophagy in pancreatic cancer and show that inhibition of autophagy may have clinical utility in the treatment of these cancers, independent of p53 status. SIGNIFICANCE: Recently, a mouse model with embryonic homozygous Trp53 deletion showed paradoxical effects of autophagy inhibition. We used a mouse model with Trp53 LOH (similar to human tumors), tumor cell lines, and patient-derived xenografts to show that p53 status does not affect response to autophagy inhibition. These findings have important implications on ongoing clinical trials. (C) 2014 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available