4.7 Article

Addressing Genetic Tumor Heterogeneity through Computationally Predictive Combination Therapy

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 166-174

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0465

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Integrative Cancer Biology Program [U54-CA112967-06]
  2. NIH/National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) Interdepartmental Biotechnology Training Program [5T32GM008334]
  3. Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute [P30-CA14051]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent tumor sequencing data suggest an urgent need to develop a methodology to directly address intratumoral heterogeneity in the design of anticancer treatment regimens. We use RNA interference to model heterogeneous tumors, and demonstrate successful validation of computational predictions for how optimized drug combinations can yield superior effects on these tumors both in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, we discover here that for many such tumors knowledge of the predominant subpopulation is insufficient for determining the best drug combination. Surprisingly, in some cases, the optimal drug combination does not include drugs that would treat any particular subpopulation most effectively, challenging straightforward intuition. We confirm examples of such a case with survival studies in a murine preclinical lymphoma model. Altogether, our approach provides new insights about design principles for combination therapy in the context of intratumoral diversity, data that should inform the development of drug regimens superior for complex tumors. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides the first example of how combination drug regimens, using existing chemotherapies, can be rationally designed to maximize tumor cell death, while minimizing the outgrowth of clonal subpopulations. (C) 2013 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available