4.7 Review

Clinical Implementation of Comprehensive Strategies to Characterize Cancer Genomes: Opportunities and Challenges

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages 297-311

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0110

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increasing number of anticancer therapeutic agents target specific mutant proteins that are expressed by many different tumor types. Recent evidence suggests that the selection of patients whose tumors harbor specific genetic alterations identifies the subset of patients who are most likely to benefit from the use of such agents. As the number of genetic alterations that provide diagnostic and/or therapeutic information increases, the comprehensive characterization of cancer genomes will be necessary to understand the spectrum of distinct genomic alterations in cancer, to identify patients who are likely to respond to particular therapies, and to facilitate the selection of treatment modalities. Rapid developments in new technologies for genomic analysis now provide the means to perform comprehensive analyses of cancer genomes. In this article, we review the current state of cancer genome analysis and discuss the challenges and opportunities necessary to implement these technologies in a clinical setting. Significance: Rapid advances in sequencing technologies now make it possible to contemplate the use of genome scale interrogation in clinical samples, which is likely to accelerate efforts to match treatments to patients. However, major challenges in technology, clinical trial design, legal and social implications, healthcare information technology, and insurance and reimbursement remain. Identifying and addressing these challenges will facilitate the implementation of personalized cancer medicine. Cancer Discovery; 1(4): 297-311. (C) 2011 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available