4.5 Article

Markedly improved outcomes and acceptable toxicity in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia following treatment with a pediatric protocol: a phase II study by the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group

Journal

BLOOD CANCER JOURNAL
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2014.72

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MHLW KAKENHI [H23-Ganrinsho-Ippan-004, H19-Seibutsushigen-Ippan-011, H17-Ganrinsho-Ippan-002]
  2. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [23-A-23]
  3. Nonprofit Organization for Support Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group (NPO-JALSG)
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26461421, 25461442] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The superiority of the pediatric protocol for adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has already been demonstrated, however, its efficacy in young adults remains unclear. The ALL202-U protocol was conducted to examine the efficacy and feasibility of a pediatric protocol in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with BCR-ABL-negative ALL. Patients aged 15-24 years (n = 139) were treated with the same protocol used for pediatric B-ALL. The primary objective of this study was to assess the disease-free survival (DFS) rate and its secondary aims were to assess toxicity, the complete remission (CR) rate and the overall survival (OS) rate. The CR rate was 94%. The 5-year DFS and OS rates were 67% (95% confidence interval (CI) 58-75%) and 73% (95% CI 64-80%), respectively. Severe adverse events were observed at a frequency that was similar to or lower than that in children treated with the same protocol. Only insufficient maintenance therapy significantly worsened the DFS (hazard ratio 5.60, P<0.001). These results indicate that this protocol may be a feasible and highly effective treatment for AYA with BCR-ABL-negative ALL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available