4.6 Article

Kinetic modeling analysis for the removal of cesium ions from aqueous solutions using polyaniline titanotungstate

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 109-119

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.09.028

Keywords

Sorption; Kinetics; Ion exchange; Polyaniline titanotungstate; Cesium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyaniline titanotungstate has been synthesized by incorporation of organic polymer polyaniline into the inorganic precipitate of titanotungstate. This material was characterized using X-ray, IR and TGA studies. The influences of initial concentration of metal ions, particle size and temperature have been reported. The comparison of composite and inorganic materials was studied and indicating that the composite material is better than the inorganic in selectivity of Cs+ ions. Thermodynamic parameters, such as changes in Gibbs free energy (Delta G), enthalpy (Delta H), and entropy (Delta S) have been calculated. The numerical values of Delta G decrease with an increase in temperature, indicating that the sorption reaction of adsorbent was spontaneous and more favorable at higher temperature. The positive values of Delta H correspond to the endothermic nature of sorption processes and suggested that chemisorptions were the predominant mechanism. A comparison of kinetic models applied to the sorption rate data of Cs+ ions was evaluated for the pseudo first-order, the pseudo second-order, intraparticle diffusion and homogeneous particle diffusion kinetic models. The results showed that both the pseudo second-order and the homogeneous particle diffusion models were found to best correlate the experimental rate data. Self diffusion coefficient (D-i), Activation energy (Ea) and entropy (Delta S*) of activation were also computed from the linearized form of Arrhenius equation. (C) 2010 King Saud University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available