4.5 Article

Clinical Features and Diagnostic Usefulness of Antibodies to Clustered Acetylcholine Receptors in the Diagnosis of Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis

Journal

JAMA NEUROLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages 642-649

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0203

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health Service National Specialised Commissioning Group for Congenital Myasthenia
  2. Watney
  3. Myasthenia Gravis Association
  4. Oxford Biomedical Research Centre fellowship
  5. Medical Research Council, United Kingdom
  6. European Union
  7. National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  8. Euroimmun AG
  9. Sir Halley Stewart Trust
  10. Athena Diagnostics, Inc.
  11. National Health Service National Specialised Commissioning Group for Neuromyelitis Optica
  12. Novartis
  13. highly specialized services to run a national congenital myasthenia service and a neuromyelitis optica service
  14. National Multiple Sclerosis Society
  15. Guthie-Jackson Charitable Foundation
  16. MRC [G117/490, G0501898, MR/M006824/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  17. Medical Research Council [G117/490, G0501898, MR/M006824/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IMPORTANCE Cell-based assays (CBAs) were shown to improve detection of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). Herein, we asked whether these assays were able to help determine the diagnosis in patients studied in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic usefulness of CBAs in the diagnosis of MG and to compare the clinical features of patients with antibodies only to clustered AChRs with those of patients with seronegative MG (SNMG). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS All patients with clinical suspicion of MG who were seen within the Division of Clinical Neurology at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, England, between November 1, 2009, and November 30, 2013. Their serum antibodies and clinical features were studied. EXPOSURES Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) and CBA were used to test for standard AChR antibodies and antibodies to clustered AChRs in 138 patients. All available samples from patients with SNMG were retrospectively tested for lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) antibodies. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Demographic, clinical, neurophysiological, and laboratory data. RESULTS In total, 138 patients were tested for antibodies to clustered AChRs, and 42 had a final diagnosis of MG. The clustered AChR CBA detected antibodies in 38.1% (16 of 42) of RIPA-negative patients with MG with 100% specificity. All patients with SNMG who were tested for LRP4 antibodies (21 of 26) were negative by CBA. Compared with patients with SNMG, patients with antibodies only to clustered AChRs had frequent prepubertal onset (62.5%[median age, 6 years; age range, 1-52 years] vs 11.5%[median age, 38 years; age range, 2-72 years], P <= .05), high prevalence of ocular MG (62.5% vs 42.3%), milder disease severity with less bulbar involvement (25.0% vs 46.2%), and absence of respiratory symptoms (0% vs 23.1%). Response to treatment and prognosis was good, with a reduced need for thymectomy (6.3% vs 19.2%) and a high proportion of patients going into remission (50.0% vs 8.3%, P <= .05). These observations also apply to the classic AChR MG phenotype seen in large series. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Cell-based assay is a useful procedure in the routine diagnosis of RIPA-negative MG, particularly in children. Patients with antibodies only to clustered AChRs appear to be younger and have milder disease than other patients with MG. These observations will have implications in planning treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available