4.8 Article

CO2 Reduction on Supported Ru/Al2O3 Catalysts: Cluster Size Dependence of Product Selectivity

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages 2449-2455

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cs400381f

Keywords

CO2 reduction; Ru/Al2O3; CO/CH4 selectivity; Ru dispersion; reaction mechanism

Funding

  1. Chemical Imaging Initiative at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
  2. US Department of Energy [DE-AC05-76RL01830]
  3. UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The catalytic performance of a series of Ru/Al2O3 catalysts with Ru content in the 0.1-5% range was examined in the reduction of CO2 with H-2. At low Ru loadings (<= 0.5%) where the active metal phase is highly dispersed (mostly atomically) on the alumina support, CO is formed with high selectivity. With increasing metal loading, the selectivity toward CH, formation increases, while that for CO production decreases. In the 0.1% Ru/Al2O3 catalyst, Ru is mostly present in atomic dispersion, as scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images obtained from the fresh sample prior to catalytic testing reveal. STEM images recorded from this same sample, following the temperature programmed reaction test, clearly show the agglomeration of small metal particles (and atoms) into 3D clusters. The clustering of the highly dispersed metal phase is responsible for the observed dramatic selectivity change during elevated temperature tests: dramatic decrease in CO and large increase in CH4 selectivity. Apparent activation energies, estimated from the slopes of Arrhenius plots, of 82 and 62 kJ/mol for CO and CH4 formation were determined, respectively, regardless of Ru loading. These results suggest that the formation of CO and CH4 follow different reaction pathways or proceed on active centers of a different nature. Reactions with CO2/H-2 and CO/H-2 mixtures (under otherwise identical reaction conditions) reveal that the onset temperature of CO2 reduction is about 150 degrees C lower than of CO reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available