4.8 Article

Mesoporous Beta Zeolite-Supported Ruthenium Nanoparticles for Selective Conversion of Synthesis Gas to C5-C11 Isoparaffins

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 441-449

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cs200670j

Keywords

mesoporous zeolite; ruthenium nanoparticles; Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; synthesis gas; gasoline; selectivity control

Funding

  1. National Basic Program of China [2010CB732303]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21173174, 21033006, 21161130522, 209230049]
  3. Key Scientific Project of Fujian Province [2009HZ0002-1]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesoporous beta (meso-beta) zeolites prepared by post-treatment of H-beta with NaOH aqueous solution were studied as supports of Ru catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis. The size and volume of the mesopores increased with the concentration of NaOH. The Bronsted acidity declined because Na+ ions were exchanged into the meso-beta during the post-treatment, and a further ion exchange of the meso-beta with NH4+ followed by calcination, forming H-meso-beta, could recover the Bronsted acidity. The use of H-meso-beta or meso-beta instead of H-beta or Na-beta as the support for FT synthesis decreased the selectivities to CH4 and heavier hydrocarbons (C-12(+)) and increased that to C-5-C-11 hydrocarbons. The C-5-C-11, selectivity depended on the concentration of NaOH used for meso-beta preparation. Under an optimum NaOH concentration, a C-5-C-11 selectivity of 77%, significantly higher than the maximum expected from Anderson-Schulz-Flory distribution (similar to 45%), was attained with a ratio of isoparaffins to n-paraffins being 2.7. The mesoporosity and the unique acidity of the meso-beta probably contribute to the selective hydrocracking of the primary heavier hydrocarbons formed on Ru nanopartides into gasoline-range liquid fuels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available