4.8 Article

The silicon cycle impacted by past ice sheets

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05689-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK NERC [NE/I008845/1]
  2. Leverhulme Trust Research Grant [RPG-2016-439]
  3. ICYLAB grant (ERC grant) [ERC-2015-Stg-678371_ICY-LAB]
  4. Leverhulme Trust
  5. Royal Society [UF120084]
  6. Czech Science Foundation (GACR) [15-17346Y]
  7. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie [708407]
  8. NERC Independent Research Fellowship [NE/K008536/1]
  9. Charles University Research Centre [204069]
  10. NERC [NE/H023879/1, NE/I008845/1, noc010013, NE/K00901X/1, NE/K008536/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Globally averaged riverine silicon (Si) concentrations and isotope composition (delta Si-30) may be affected by the expansion and retreat of large ice sheets during glacial-interglacial cycles. Here we provide evidence of this based on the delta Si-30 composition of meltwater runoff from a Greenland Ice Sheet catchment. Glacier runoff has the lightest delta Si-30 measured in running waters (-0.25 +/- 0.12 parts per thousand), significantly lower than nonglacial rivers (1.25 +/- 0.68 parts per thousand), such that the overall decline in glacial runoff since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) may explain 0.06-0.17 parts per thousand of the observed ocean delta Si-30 rise (0.5-1.0 parts per thousand). A marine sediment core proximal to Iceland provides further evidence for transient, low-delta Si-30 meltwater pulses during glacial termination. Diatom Si uptake during the LGM was likely similar to present day due to an expanded Si inventory, which raises the possibility of a feedback between ice sheet expansion, enhanced Si export to the ocean and reduced CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, because of the importance of diatoms in the biological carbon pump.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available