4.8 Article

In vivo phosphoproteomics reveals kinase activity profiles that predict treatment outcome in triple-negative breast cancer

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05742-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AECC Scientific Foundation Beca de Retorno 2010
  2. ISCIII [PIE15/00068]
  3. La Caixa PhD Fellowship, 2011
  4. FPI grant [SEV-2015-0510-16-6]
  5. Miguel Servet Program [CP14/00228]
  6. PRIME-XS project [262067]
  7. European Union Seventh Framework Program
  8. project Proteins At Work [184.032.201]
  9. program of the Netherlands Proteomics Centre by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  10. NWO through a VIDI grant [723.012.102]
  11. [FIS PI10/00288]
  12. [FIS PI13/00430]
  13. [FIS PI11-00832]
  14. [FIS PI14-00726]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks prognostic and predictive markers. Here, we use high-throughput phosphoproteomics to build a functional TNBC taxonomy. A cluster of 159 phosphosites is upregulated in relapsed cases of a training set (n = 34 patients), with 11 hyperactive kinases accounting for this phosphoprofile. A mass-spectrometry-to-immunohistochemistry translation step, assessing 2 independent validation sets, reveals 6 kinases with preserved independent prognostic value. The kinases split the validation set into two patterns: one without hyperactive kinases being associated with a >90% relapse-free rate, and the other one showing >= 1 hyperactive kinase and being associated with an up to 9.5-fold higher relapse risk. Each kinase pattern encompasses different mutational patterns, simplifying mutation-based taxonomy. Drug regimens designed based on these 6 kinases show promising antitumour activity in TNBC cell lines and patient-derived xenografts. In summary, the present study elucidates phosphosites and kinases implicated in TNBC and suggests a target-based clinical classification system for TNBC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available