4.8 Article

21st-century modeled permafrost carbon emissions accelerated by abrupt thaw beneath lakes

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05738-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [ARCSS 1500931, ARC-1304823]
  2. NASA [ABoVE NNX15AU49A, ABoVE 1572960]
  3. ERC [338335]
  4. HGF [ERC-0013]
  5. ESA GlobPermafrost
  6. BMBF [03G0836C, 01LN1709A]
  7. DOE [DE-SC0010580, DE-SC0016440]
  8. Directorate For Geosciences
  9. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1304823] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Directorate For Geosciences
  11. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1500931] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0010580, DE-SC0016440] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Permafrost carbon feedback (PCF) modeling has focused on gradual thaw of near-surface permafrost leading to enhanced carbon dioxide and methane emissions that accelerate global climate warming. These state-of-the-art land models have yet to incorporate deeper, abrupt thaw in the PCF. Here we use model data, supported by field observations, radiocarbon dating, and remote sensing, to show that methane and carbon dioxide emissions from abrupt thaw beneath thermokarst lakes will more than double radiative forcing from circumpolar permafrost-soil carbon fluxes this century. Abrupt thaw lake emissions are similar under moderate and high representative concentration pathways (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5), but their relative contribution to the PCF is much larger under the moderate warming scenario. Abrupt thaw accelerates mobilization of deeply frozen, ancient carbon, increasing C-14-depleted permafrost soil carbon emissions by similar to 125-190% compared to gradual thaw alone. These findings demonstrate the need to incorporate abrupt thaw processes in earth system models for more comprehensive projection of the PCF this century.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available