4.8 Article

Persistent spin excitations in doped antiferromagnets revealed by resonant inelastic light scattering

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4314

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and Engineering [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  2. Computational Materials and Chemical Sciences Network (CMCSN) [DE-SC0007091]
  3. Aneesur Rahman Postdoctoral Fellowship at Argonne National Laboratory, operated under the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. Strategic Programs for Innovative Research (SPIRE)
  5. MEXT
  6. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [1147470]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  8. [22340097]
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22340097] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How coherent quasiparticles emerge by doping quantum antiferromagnets is a key question in correlated electron systems, whose resolution is needed to elucidate the phase diagram of copper oxides. Recent resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) experiments in hole-doped cuprates have purported to measure high-energy collective spin excitations that persist well into the overdoped regime and bear a striking resemblance to those found in the parent compound, challenging the perception that spin excitations should weaken with doping and have a diminishing effect on superconductivity. Here we show that RIXS at the Cu L-3-edge indeed provides access to the spin dynamical structure factor once one considers the full influence of light polarization. Further we demonstrate that high-energy spin excitations do not correlate with the doping dependence of T-c, while low-energy excitations depend sensitively on doping and show ferromagnetic correlations. This suggests that high-energy spin excitations are marginal to pairing in cuprate superconductors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available