4.8 Article

Assembly of complex plant-fungus networks

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6273

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hakubi Center for Advanced Research, Kyoto University, JSPS KAKENHI [26711026]
  2. Funding Program for Next Generation World-Leading Researchers of Cabinet Office, the Government of Japan [GS014]
  3. FAPESP [2009/54422-8]
  4. Danish Science Research Council [1323-00278]
  5. NSF [DEB-1048333]
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1048333] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Environmental Biology [1048333] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26711026] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Species in ecological communities build complex webs of interaction. Although revealing the architecture of these networks is fundamental to understanding ecological and evolutionary dynamics in nature, it has been difficult to characterize the structure of most species-rich ecological systems. By overcoming this limitation through next-generation sequencing technology, we herein uncover the network architecture of below-ground plant-fungus symbioses, which are ubiquitous to terrestrial ecosystems. The examined symbiotic network of a temperate forest in Japan includes 33 plant species and 387 functionally and phylogenetically diverse fungal taxa, and the overall network architecture differs fundamentally from that of other ecological networks. In contrast to results for other ecological networks and theoretical predictions for symbiotic networks, the plant-fungus network shows moderate or relatively low levels of interaction specialization and modularity and an unusual pattern of 'nested' network architecture. These results suggest that species-rich ecological networks are more architecturally diverse than previously recognized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available