4.8 Article

High-quality genome (re) assembly using chromosomal contact data

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6695

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the 7th Framework Program (FP7) [260822]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-09-PIRI-0024, ANR-11-MONU-020-02]
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  4. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer [20100600373]
  5. European Research Council [ERC-2012-AdG 322790]
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-PIRI-0024] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Closing gaps in draft genome assemblies can be costly and time-consuming, and published genomes are therefore often left 'unfinished.' Here we show that genome-wide chromosome conformation capture (3C) data can be used to overcome these limitations, and present a computational approach rooted in polymer physics that determines the most likely genome structure using chromosomal contact data. This algorithm-named GRAAL-generates high-quality assemblies of genomes in which repeated and duplicated regions are accurately represented and offers a direct probabilistic interpretation of the computed structures. We first validated GRAAL on the reference genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as well as other yeast isolates, where GRAAL recovered both known and unknown complex chromosomal structural variations. We then applied GRAAL to the finishing of the assembly of Trichoderma reesei and obtained a number of contigs congruent with the know karyotype of this species. Finally, we showed that GRAAL can accurately reconstruct human chromosomes from either fragments generated in silico or contigs obtained from de novo assembly. In all these applications, GRAAL compared favourably to recently published programmes implementing related approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available