4.8 Article

Angiotensin II plasma levels are linked to disease severity and predict fatal outcomes in H7N9-infected patients

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4595

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2009CB522105, 2011ZX09307-001-01]
  2. Technology Group Project for Infectious Disease Control of Zhejiang Province [2009R50041]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities as well as an intramural special grant for influenza virus research from the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSZD-EW-Z-002]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81300057, 81373141, 81230002]
  5. Ministry of Health [201302017]
  6. Ministry of Education (Biotherapy of 2011 innovation)
  7. 111 project [B08007]
  8. Austrian Academy of Sciences
  9. EU Advanced ERC grant
  10. NSFC Innovative Research Group [81321063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel influenza A (H7N9) virus of avian origin emerged in eastern China in the spring of 2013. This virus causes severe disease in humans, including acute and often lethal respiratory failure. As of January 2014, 275 cases of H7N9-infected patients had been reported, highlighting the urgency of identifying biomarkers for predicting disease severity and fatal outcomes. Here, we show that plasma levels of angiotensin II, a major regulatory peptide of the renin-angiotensin system, are markedly elevated in H7N9 patients and are associated with disease progression. Moreover, the sustained high levels of angiotensin II in these patients are strongly correlated with mortality. The predictive value of angiotensin II is higher than that of C-reactive protein and some clinical parameters such as the PaO2/FiO(2) ratio (partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen). Our findings indicate that angiotensin II is a biomarker for lethality in flu infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available