4.8 Article

A bio-inspired swellable microneedle adhesive for mechanical interlocking with tissue

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2715

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM086433]
  2. NIH [P41EB015903]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A6A3A03039055]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A6A3A03039055] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Achieving significant adhesion to soft tissues while minimizing tissue damage poses a considerable clinical challenge. Chemical-based adhesives require tissue-specific reactive chemistry, typically inducing a significant inflammatory response. Staples are fraught with limitations including high-localized tissue stress and increased risk of infection, and nerve and blood vessel damage. Here inspired by the endoparasite Pomphorhynchus laevis, which swells its proboscis to attach to its host's intestinal wall, we have developed a biphasic microneedle array that mechanically interlocks with tissue through swellable microneedle tips, achieving similar to 3.5-fold increase in adhesion strength compared with staples in skin graft fixation, and removal force of similar to 4.5 N cm(-2) from intestinal mucosal tissue. Comprising a poly(styrene)-block-poly(acrylic acid) swellable tip and non-swellable polystyrene core, conical microneedles penetrate tissue with minimal insertion force and depth, yet high adhesion strength in their swollen state. Uniquely, this design provides universal soft tissue adhesion with minimal damage, less traumatic removal, reduced risk of infection and delivery of bioactive therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available