4.8 Article

Retinoic acid receptor alpha is associated with tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3175

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. GlycoHit FP7 EU project
  3. Swedish Cancer Society
  4. Stockholm's cancer Society
  5. Swedish State under the LUA-agreement (Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg) [VGFOUREG-75911]
  6. King Gustav V Jubilee Clinic Cancer Research Foundation, Gothenburg [2009: 49]
  7. Linkoping University Hospital Research Foundation, Linkoping
  8. Gosta Miltons Donationsfond, Stockholm, Sweden [802004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

About one-third of oestrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen relapse. Here we identify the nuclear receptor retinoic acid receptor alpha as a marker of tamoxifen resistance. Using quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics, we show that retinoic acid receptor alpha protein networks and levels differ in a tamoxifen-sensitive (MCF7) and a tamoxifen-resistant (LCC2) cell line. High intratumoural retinoic acid receptor alpha protein levels also correlate with reduced relapse-free survival in oestrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen solely. A similar retinoic acid receptor alpha expression pattern is seen in a comparable independent patient cohort. An oestrogen receptor alpha and retinoic acid receptor alpha ligand screening reveals that tamoxifen-resistant LCC2 cells have increased sensitivity to retinoic acid receptor alpha ligands and are less sensitive to oestrogen receptor alpha ligands compared with MCF7 cells. Our data indicate that retinoic acid receptor alpha may be a novel therapeutic target and a predictive factor for oestrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available