4.8 Article

The blood-stage malaria antigen PfRH5 is susceptible to vaccine-inducible cross-strain neutralizing antibody

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1615

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [089455/2/09/z, 089833/Z/09/Z, 077108, 084113/z/07/z]
  2. EU [MESTCT-2005-020492]
  3. Foundation for the NIH through the Grand Challenges in Global Health Initiative of the Gates Foundation
  4. PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative
  5. NIH NIAID
  6. [G0600424]
  7. [G1000527]
  8. Wellcome Trust [089833/Z/09/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  9. MRC [G1000527, G0600424] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [G1000527, G0600424] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current vaccine strategies against the asexual blood stage of Plasmodium falciparum are mostly focused on well-studied merozoite antigens that induce immune responses after natural exposure, but have yet to induce robust protection in any clinical trial. Here we compare humancompatible viral-vectored vaccines targeting ten different blood-stage antigens. We show that the full-length P. falciparum reticulocyte-binding protein homologue 5 ( PfRH5) is highly susceptible to cross-strain neutralizing vaccine-induced antibodies, out-performing all other antigens delivered by the same vaccine platform. We fi nd that, despite being susceptible to antibody, PfRH5 is unlikely to be under substantial immune selection pressure; there is minimal acquisition of anti-PfRH5 IgG antibodies in malaria-exposed Kenyans. These data challenge the widespread beliefs that any merozoite antigen that is highly susceptible to immune attack would be subject to signifi cant levels of antigenic polymorphism, and that erythrocyte invasion by P. falciparum is a degenerate process involving a series of parallel redundant pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available