4.8 Article

MicroRNA122 is a key regulator of α-fetoprotein expression and influences the aggressiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1345

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [22390058, 22590718, 17016016, 20390204]
  2. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  5. Senri Life Science Foundation
  6. Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research
  7. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  8. Canadian Cancer Society [019389]
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22390058, 20390204, 17016016, 22590718] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is not only a widely used biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance, but is also clinically recognized as linked with aggressive tumour behaviour. Here we show that deregulation of microRNA122, a liver-specific microRNA, is a cause of both AFP elevation and a more biologically aggressive phenotype in HCC. We identify CUX1, a direct target of microRNA122, as a common central mediator of these two effects. Using liver tissues from transgenic mice in which microRNA122 is functionally silenced, an orthotopic xenograft tumour model, and human clinical samples, we further demonstrate that a microRNA122/CUX1/microRNA214/ZBTB20 pathway regulates AFP expression. We also show that the microRNA122/CUX1/RhoA pathway regulates the aggressive characteristics of tumours. We conclude that microRNA122 and associated signalling proteins may represent viable therapeutic targets, and that serum AFP levels in HCC patients may be a surrogate marker for deregulated intracellular microRNA122 signalling pathways in HCC tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available