4.8 Article

Second-generation environmental sequencing unmasks marine metazoan biodiversity

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 1, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1095

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/E001505/1]
  2. Post Genomic and Proteomics Grant [NE/F001266/1]
  3. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BD/27413/2006]
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E001505/1, NE/F001290/1, NBAF010003, NE/F001266/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/27413/2006] Funding Source: FCT
  6. NERC [NBAF010003, NE/F001266/1, NE/E001505/1, NE/F001290/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biodiversity is of crucial importance for ecosystem functioning, sustainability and resilience, but the magnitude and organization of marine diversity at a range of spatial and taxonomic scales are undefined. In this paper, we use second-generation sequencing to unmask putatively diverse marine metazoan biodiversity in a Scottish temperate benthic ecosystem. We show that remarkable differences in diversity occurred at microgeographical scales and refute currently accepted ecological and taxonomic paradigms of meiofaunal identity, rank abundance and concomitant understanding of trophic dynamics. Richness estimates from the current benchmarked Operational Clustering of Taxonomic Units from Parallel UltraSequencing analyses are broadly aligned with those derived from morphological assessments. However, the slope of taxon rarefaction curves for many phyla remains incomplete, suggesting that the true alpha diversity is likely to exceed current perceptions. The approaches provide a rapid, objective and cost-effective taxonomic framework for exploring links between ecosystem structure and function of all hitherto intractable, but ecologically important, communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available