4.4 Article

Redox status expressed as GSH:GSSG ratio as a marker for oxidative stress in paediatric tumour patients

Journal

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 1247-1253

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.931

Keywords

glutathione; paediatric tumour patients; oxidative stress; high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection

Categories

Funding

  1. NANOSEMED GA AV [KAN208130801]
  2. NanoBioTECell GA CR [102/11/1068]
  3. CEITEC [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068]
  4. Project for Conceptual Development of Research Organization [00064203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative stress causes profound alterations of various biological structures, including cellular membranes, lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, and it is involved in numerous malignancies. Reduced glutathione (GSH) is considered to be one of the most important scavengers of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and its ratio with oxidised glutathione (GSSG) may be used as a marker of oxidative stress. The main aim of this study was to determine GSH:GSSG ratio in the blood serum of paediatric cancer patients to use this ratio as a potential marker of oxidative stress. The whole procedure was optimised and the recoveries for both substances were greater than 80% under the optimised conditions. We analysed a group of paediatric patients (n=116) with various types of cancer, including neuroblastoma, anaplastic ependymoma, germ cell tumour, genital tract tumour, lymphadenopathy, rhabdomyosarcoma, nephroblastoma, Ewing's sarcoma, osteosarcoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, medulloblastoma and retinoblastoma. We simultaneously determined the levels of reduced and oxidised glutathione, and thus, its ratio in the blood serum of the patients. The highest ratio was observed in retinoblastoma patients and the lowest in anaplastic ependymoma. We were able to distinguish between the diagnoses based on the results of the obtained GSH:GSSG ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available