4.4 Article

Chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer complicated by idiopathic interstitial pneumonia

Journal

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 477-482

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.753

Keywords

non-small cell lung cancer; idiopathic interstitial pneumonia; acute exacerbation; chemotherapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23790425] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) is considered to be one of the risk factors for lung cancer (LC). However, therapeutic options for patients with LC complicated by LIP are not well established. In this study, we investigated the feasibility and efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) complicated by IIP (NSCLC-IIP). We retrospectively analyzed 22 NSCLC-IIP patients who received chemotherapy. To determine how IIP affected the clinical outcomes in NSCLC, they were compared with 276 NSCLC patients without IIP, who were treated with chemotherapy alone. The response rate (partial response + stable disease) was 72.3% (17/22), whereas the incidence of acute exacerbation (AE) was 13.6% (3/22) in NSCLC-IIP patients treated with chemotherapy. NSCLC-IIP patients had significantly shorter survival compared with NSCLC patients without IIP (P<0.001) following chemotherapy, although the response rates to chemotherapy were not significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, in NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy, IIP was a significantly unfavorable factor for progression-free and overall survival. Despite similar response rates to chemotherapy, NSCLC-IIP patients showed poorer prognosis than NSCLC patients without IIP, possibly due to the natural course of IIP. Chemotherapy may be a feasible option for NSCLC-IIP, if the risks of adverse effects are acceptable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available