4.5 Review

Influences of immunostimulants on phagocytes in cultured fish: a mini review

Journal

REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 1219-1227

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/raq.12288

Keywords

dendrictic cells; immunostimulants; macrophages; mast cells; monocytes; neutrophils

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31572651]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2015A030308020, 2016A030313748]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2015A020209181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lower vertebrates like fish mostly depend on innate immunity as the first line of defence against invading pathogens. One of the defence mechanisms in innate immunity for fish is the use of phagocytic cells such as monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells and dendritic cells in fighting pathogens. These cellular cells employ a variety of mechanisms in protecting fish including but not limited to; the use of pattern recognition receptors and antigen presenting cells to detect the presence of pathogens in host, neutralising them using measures including; inflammation, production of lysosomal enzymes released into the phagosome to neutralising pathogens and prevention of systemic autoimmunity by apoptosis. Some phagocytic cells play the extra role of serving as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity in fish. Recent accumulating data showed that phagocyte cell activity in fish could be enhanced by a natural or chemical substance (immunostimulants) that stimulates the immune system in fish principally meant to enhance the immune response mechanisms. In this review, the main focus is on elucidating the distinct phagocytic mechanisms played by monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells and dendritic cells as principal phagocytes in immune defence and how their activities are influenced by immunostimulants in cultured fish.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available