4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): Comparison with immediate transfusion following massive hemorrhage in swine

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages 930-936

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000877

Keywords

Swine; shock; hemorrhagic; aorta; endovascular procedures

Funding

  1. Telemedicine and Advanced Technologies Research Center, Fort Detrick, MD
  2. Pryor Medical
  3. Geneva Foundation, Tacoma, WA
  4. US Department of Energy
  5. US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is less invasive than emergency department thoracotomy for the treatment of massive hemorrhage. We evaluated the effects of REBOA on carotid blood flow (Q(carotid)) in a porcine model of massive hemorrhage. We hypothesized that REBOA restores Q(carotid) faster than reinfusion of blood. METHODS Spontaneously breathing sedated Sinclair pigs underwent exponential hemorrhage of 65% total blood volume in 1 hour. They were randomized into three groups. Positive control (PC, n = 7) underwent immediate transfusion of shed blood. REBOA (n = 21) received a novel 7 Fr ER-REBOA catheter (Pryor Medical, Arvada, CO) placed into aortic Zone 1 via a femoral artery introducer for 30 minutes or 60 minutes, with transfusion either after deflation or midway through inflation. Negative control (n = 7) received no resuscitation. Q(carotid) was recorded continuously using an ultrasonic flow probe. Survival and time between Q(carotid, min) and both a stable maximal value (Q(carotid, max)) and restoration of baseline flow (Q(carotid, new BL)) were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS Median time to Q(carotid, max) was 3.0 minutes in the REBOA group versus 9.6 minutes in the control group (p = 0.006). Median time to Q(carotid, new BL) was 6.0 minutes in the REBOA group versus 20.5 minutes in the PC group (p = 0.11). Slope of the linear regression between Q(carotid, min) and Q(carotid, new BL) was 16.7 in REBOA and 10.4 in PC (p = 0.31). Four-hour survival was 95% (20 of 21) in the REBOA group versus 71% (5 of 7) in the PC group (p = 0.06) and 0% in the negative control group. CONCLUSION REBOA resulted in the restoration of Q(carotid) (cerebrovascular resuscitation) at least as rapidly as retransfusion of shed blood, with equivalent 4-hour survival. Further studies of REBOA, to include mitigation of end-organ effects and longer follow-up, are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available