4.4 Article

Effect of piracetam on the cognitive performance of patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery: A meta-analysis

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 429-434

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2013.1425

Keywords

neuroprotective agents; meta-analysis; cognition disorders; piracetam; bypass coronary surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognitive impairments are observed in numerous patients following coronary bypass surgery, and piracetam are nootropic compounds that modulate cerebral functions by directly enhancing cognitive processes. The present meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the protective effect of piracetam on the cognitive performance of patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. The relevant studies were identified by searching Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and the Cochrane Library up to June 2013 and the pertinent bibliographies from the retrieved studies were reviewed. Data were selected from the studies according to predefined criteria. The meta-analysis included two randomized control trials involving 184 patients and including the Syndrom-Kurz test (SKT). Findings of the meta-analysis showed that following treatment the change from baseline observed in five SKT subtest scores, conducted with piracetam patients, indicated a significant advantage over those patients that were in the placebo group. The subtests included immediate pictured object recall, weighted mean difference (WMD)=0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.31, P<0.00001; delayed pictured object recall, WMD=0.74, 95% CI 0.19-1.28, P=0.008; delayed picture recognition, WMD=0.82, 95% CI 0.31-1.31, P=0.001; immediate word recall, WMD=0.87, 95% CI 0.47-1.28, P<0.0001; and letter interference, WMD=3.46, 95% CI -5.69 to -1.23, P=0.002. These results indicated that piracetam may have been effective in improving the short-term cognitive performance of patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. High quality, well-controlled and longer randomized trials are required to corroborate this result.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available