4.1 Article

The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders' Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing

Journal

NEUROETHICS
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 541-578

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6

Keywords

Brain-computer interfaces; Brain-machine interfaces; Neuroethics; Neuroimaging; Locked-in syndrome

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economic Affairs
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the Netherlands, the Netherlands
  3. Information and Communication Technologies Coordination and Support action FutureBNCI [ICT- 2010-248320]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4(th) International BCI conference, which took place in May-June 2010 in Asilomar, California. We assessed respondents' opinions about a number of topics. First, we investigated preferences for terminology and definitions relating to BCIs. Second, we assessed respondents' expectations on the marketability of different BCI applications (BCIs for healthy people, BCIs for assistive technology, BCIs-controlled neuroprostheses and BCIs as therapy tools). Third, we investigated opinions about ethical issues related to BCI research for the development of assistive technology: informed consent process with locked-in patients, risk-benefit analyses, team responsibility, consequences of BCI on patients' and families' lives, liability and personal identity and interaction with the media. Finally, we asked respondents which issues are urgent in BCI research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available