4.1 Article

Ibuprofen Sodium Is Absorbed Faster than Standard Ibuprofen Tablets: Results of Two Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Pharmacokinetic Studies

Journal

DRUGS IN R&D
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 283-290

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40268-014-0070-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pfizer Consumer Healthcare
  2. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background A novel ibuprofen (IBU) formulation, Advil (R) Film-Coated Tablets (IBUNa), was developed. Objective Pharmacokinetic comparison of IBUNa versus other IBU formulations. Study Design Two randomized, single-dose, open-label, five-way crossover pharmacokinetic studies. Setting Inpatient research clinic. Subjects Seventy-one healthy adult volunteers. Intervention Study 1: In three periods, fasted subjects received 400-mg IBU dose equivalents as IBUNa 2 x 256 mg, Advil (R) Liqui-Gels (R) (IBULG) 2 x 200 mg, and Motrin (R) IB (IBUMot) 2 x 200 mg tablets. In two periods following a high-fat breakfast, subjects received 400-mg IBU dose equivalents as IBUNa 2 x 256 mg and IBULG 2 x 200 mg. Study 2: In five study periods, fasted subjects received 400-mg IBU dose equivalents as IBUNa 2 x 256 mg, Advil (R) FastGel (R) (IBUFG) 2 x 200 mg, Nurofen (R) (IBUNur) 2x 200 mg, Advil (R) (IBUAdv) 2 x 200 mg, and Nurofen (R) Express containing IBU lysinate (IBULys) 2 x 342 mg. Main Outcome Measure Log-transformed area under the plasma concentration versus time curve to last observable concentration (AUC(L)) and maximum plasma concentration (C-max) were the primary pharmacokinetic parameters; time to maximum measured plasma concentration (T-max) was analyzed post hoc. Results IBUNa was bioequivalent to IBULG (fasted and fed) and IBUFG and IBULys (fasted) for rate (C-max) and extent (AUC(L)) of IBU absorption. After fasting, AUC(L) was bioequivalent for IBUNa and IBUMot, IBUAdv, and IBUNur, but C-max occurred significantly earlier with IBUNa. After fasting, median IBUNa T-max was comparable to that for IBULG, IBUFG, and IBU(Ly)s, but was much shorter than that for IBUMot, IBUNur, and IBUAdv. Food slowed absorption of IBUNa and IBULG similarly. All treatments were tolerated similarly. Conclusion IBUNa is absorbed faster but to a similar extent as standard IBU formulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available