4.6 Article

Medical students' choices of specialty in The Gambia: the need for career counseling

Journal

BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-72

Keywords

Medical students; Specialties; Choices; Careers

Funding

  1. African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP Secretariat) at the European Union through the ACP-EU Cooperation Programme in Higher Education (EDULINK) [9 ACP RPR 12, 31]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Understanding preferences for specialties by medical students and the factors driving choices assists policy makers in ensuring optimal spread of personnel across disciplines. Methods: This cross-sectional survey using self-administered structured questionnaires was conducted on consenting students of the first medical school in The Gambia, established in 1999. Data collection was in June/July 2011. Questions were on sociodemographic characteristics of students, their parents, factors related to career preferences and opinions about counseling services. Data were analysed using JMP 8.0 software. Results: Respondents were 52.4% of 202 eligible students. Mean age was 24.1 +/- 5.0 years. Females constituted 54.7%. Muslims were 72.7% while Gambians formed 77.0%. Commonest specialties chosen by females were Obstetrics/Gynaecology, Paediatrics and Surgery in that order, while males preferred Internal Medicine, Surgery and Obstetrics/Gynaecology. Commonest factors influencing choices by females were 'focus on urgent care' (65.5%) and 'intellectual content of specialty' (56.9%). For males, these were 'intellectual content of specialty' (60.4%) and 'focus on urgent care'/'individual's competence' (50.0% each). More females (30.0%) than males (23.0%) had ever received career counseling, but all students desired it. Conclusions: Significant gender differences exist in specialty choices and factors influencing these choices amongst these students. All want career counseling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available