4.1 Article

Adenosine testing after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation improves long-term clinical outcome

Journal

NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 447-455

Publisher

BOHN STAFLEU VAN LOGHUM BV
DOI: 10.1007/s12471-012-0319-1

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation; Ablation; Pulmonary veins; Cryoballoon; Adenosine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Adenosine infusion after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency energy reveals dormant muscular sleeves and predicts atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. The aim of our study was to determine whether adenosine could reveal dormant PV sleeves after cryoballoon isolation and study its effect on long-term recurrence of AF. Methods Patients with paroxysmal AF underwent cryoballoon PVI. After PVI, adenosine 25 mg was infused to test for dormant muscular sleeves in each vein. If reconnection under adenosine was shown, further cryoballoon ablation was performed until no more reconnection occurred. Follow-up was performed with ECG, 24-h Holter recording, and a symptom questionnaire at three monthly intervals. Transtelephonic Holter monitoring was performed for 1 month before and 3 months after PVI. Patients who underwent cryoballoon PVI without adenosine administration were used as controls for comparison. Results In the study group (n = 34, 24 males), adenosine revealed dormant sleeves in 9/132 (8 %) veins, and 7/34 (21 %) patients. All but one vein was further treated until the dormant sleeves were isolated. During a mean follow-up of 520 +/- 147 days, 23/34 (68 %) patients were free of AF without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). In the control group (n = 65, 46 males), 29/65 (46 %) were free of AF without AADs. There were significantly less AF recurrences in the study group (p = 0.04). Conclusions Adenosine administration after cryoballoon PVI reveals dormant muscular sleeves in 21 % of patients. Clinical follow-up shows that adenosine testing is effective in reducing AF recurrence after cryoballoon ablation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available