4.7 Review

Systems biology of cisplatin resistance: past, present and future

Journal

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2013.428

Keywords

BCL-2; carboplatin; CTR1; DNA damage response; oxaliplatin; p53

Categories

Funding

  1. Ligue contre le Cancer (equipe labellisee)
  2. Agence National de la Recherche (ANR)
  3. Association pour la recherche sur le cancer (ARC)
  4. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC)
  5. Canceropole Ile-de-France
  6. Institut National du Cancer (INCa)
  7. Fondation Bettencourt-Schueller
  8. Fondation de France
  9. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  10. European Commission (ArtForce)
  11. European Research Council (ERC)
  12. LabEx Immuno-Oncology
  13. LabEx LERMIT
  14. SIRIC Stratified Oncology Cell DNA Repair and Tumor Immune Elimination (SOCRATE)
  15. SIRIC Cancer Research
  16. Personalized Medicine (CARPEM)
  17. Paris Alliance of Cancer Research Institutes (PACRI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The platinum derivative cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), best known as cisplatin, is currently employed for the clinical management of patients affected by testicular, ovarian, head and neck, colorectal, bladder and lung cancers. For a long time, the antineoplastic effects of cisplatin have been fully ascribed to its ability to generate unrepairable DNA lesions, hence inducing either a permanent proliferative arrest known as cellular senescence or the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis. Accumulating evidence now suggests that the cytostatic and cytotoxic activity of cisplatin involves both a nuclear and a cytoplasmic component. Despite the unresolved issues regarding its mechanism of action, the administration of cisplatin is generally associated with high rates of clinical responses. However, in the vast majority of cases, malignant cells exposed to cisplatin activate a multipronged adaptive response that renders them less susceptible to the antiproliferative and cytotoxic effects of the drug, and eventually resume proliferation. Thus, a large fraction of cisplatin-treated patients is destined to experience therapeutic failure and tumor recurrence. Throughout the last four decades great efforts have been devoted to the characterization of the molecular mechanisms whereby neoplastic cells progressively lose their sensitivity to cisplatin. The advent of high-content and high-throughput screening technologies has accelerated the discovery of cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic pathways that may be targeted to prevent or reverse cisplatin resistance in cancer patients. Still, the multifactorial and redundant nature of this phenomenon poses a significant barrier against the identification of effective chemosensitization strategies. Here, we discuss recent systems biology studies aimed at deconvoluting the complex circuitries that underpin cisplatin resistance, and how their findings might drive the development of rational approaches to tackle this clinically relevant problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available