4.7 Article

Amyloid-β and Alzheimer's disease type pathology differentially affects the calcium signalling toolkit in astrocytes from different brain regions

Journal

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2013.145

Keywords

astrocytes; Alzheimer's disease; entorhinal cortex; hippocampus; calcium deregulation; amyloid-beta

Categories

Funding

  1. Fondazione Cariplo
  2. Welcome Trust
  3. Alzheimer 's Research Trust (UK)
  4. Spanish Government
  5. ISCIII-Subdireccion General de Evaluacion y Fomento de la Investigacion [PI10/02738]
  6. FEDER
  7. Government of the Basque Country [AE-2010-1-28, AEGV10/16, GV-2011111020]
  8. Plan Nacional de I+D+I
  9. Alzheimers Research UK [ART-PG2004A-1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The entorhinal-hippocampal circuit is severely affected in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here, we demonstrate that amyloid-beta (A beta) differentially affects primary cultured astrocytes derived from the entorhinal cortex (EC) and from the hippocampus from non-transgenic controls and 3xTg-AD transgenic mice. Exposure to 100 nM of A beta resulted in increased expression of the metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGluR5) and its downstream InsP(3) receptor type 1 (InsP(3)R1) in hippocampal but not in EC astrocytes. Amplitudes of Ca2+ responses to an mGluR5 agonist, DHPG, and to ATP, another metabotropic agonist coupled to InsP(3)Rs, were significantly increased in Ab beta-treated hippocampal but not in EC astrocytes. Previously we demonstrated that senile plaque formation in 3xTg-AD mice triggers astrogliosis in hippocampal but not in EC astrocytes. The different sensitivities of the Ca2+ signalling toolkit of EC versus hippocampal astrocytes to A beta may account for the lack of astrogliosis in the EC, which in turn can explain the higher vulnerability of this region to AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available