4.7 Article

The significance of galectin-3 as a new basal cell marker in prostate cancer

Journal

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2013.277

Keywords

Gal-3; AR; prostate cancer; basal marker

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R37CA46120-19]
  2. American Cancer Society grant [11-053-01-IRG]
  3. NIH Center grant [P30CA022453]
  4. Perinatology Research Branch of the National Institutes of Child Health and Development, Wayne State University
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R37CA046120, P30CA022453] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prostate cancer may originate from distinct cell types, resulting in the heterogeneity of this disease. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) and androgen receptor (AR) have been reported to play important roles in the progression of prostate cancer, and their heterogeneous expressions might be associated with different cancer subtypes. Our study found that in various prostate cancer cell lines Gal-3 expression was always opposite to AR expression and other luminal cell markers but consistent with basal cell markers including glutathione S-transferase-pi and Bcl-2. This expression pattern was confirmed in human prostate cancer tissues. Our results also showed that prostate cancer cells positive with basal cell markers were more aggressive. Downregulation of Gal-3 expression resulted in increased apoptotic potential and decreased metastasis potential of prostate cancer cells. Our findings demonstrate for the first time that Gal-3 may serve as a new marker for basal characteristics of prostate cancer epithelium. This study helps us to better understand the heterogeneity of prostate cancer. The clinical significance of this study lies in the application of Gal-3 to distinguish prostate cancer subtypes and improve treatment efficacy with designed personalized therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available