4.7 Article

Acquired differential regulation of caspase-8 in cisplatin-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer

Journal

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2012.186

Keywords

Apoptosis; BAX; BAK; non-small-cell lung cancer; cisplatin resistance; caspase-8

Categories

Funding

  1. Northern Ireland HSC R&D Office doctoral fellowship
  2. British Lung Foundation
  3. Department for Education and Learning
  4. Cancer Research UK
  5. CR-UK Clinician Scientist Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Failure to efficiently induce apoptosis contributes to cisplatin resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although BCL-2-associated X protein (BAX) and BCL-2 antagonist killer (BAK) are critical regulators of the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway, their requirement has not been robustly established in relation to cisplatin. Here, we show that cisplatin can efficiently bypass mitochondrial apoptosis block caused by loss of BAX and BAK, via activation of the extrinsic death receptor pathway in some model cell lines. Apoptosis resistance following cisplatin can only be observed when both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways are blocked, consistent with redundancy between mitochondrial and death receptor pathways in cisplatin-induced apoptosis. In H460 NSCLC cells, caspase-8 cleavage was shown to be induced by cisplatin and is dependent on death receptor 4, death receptor 5, Fas-associated protein with death domain, acid sphingomyelinase and ceramide synthesis. In contrast, cisplatin-resistant cells fail to activate caspase-8 via this pathway despite conserving sensitivity to death ligand-driven activation. Accordingly, caspase-8 activation block acquired during cisplatin resistance, can be bypassed by death receptor agonism. Cell Death and Disease (2012) 3, e449; doi:10.1038/cddis.2012.186; published online 20 December 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available