4.7 Editorial Material

Use and Misuse of Statistical Significance in Survival Analyses

Journal

MBIO
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00904-14

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [P01 AI056320] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In most preclinical disease models, survival analyses are the gold standard for measuring the efficacy of medical interventions such as therapeutics or vaccines. In these analyses, treatment regimens that promote the survival and/or reduce the morbidity of experimental subjects (e.g., mice) are tested for efficacy. Although these analyses appear to be relatively straightforward, there are associated caveats regarding interpretation of the results that we wish to discuss in this editorial. Of particular concern is overinterpretation of the biological significance of survival data based on statistical significance rather than durability of protection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available