4.7 Editorial Material

Large-Scale Biochemical Profiling of the Candida albicans Biofilm Matrix: New Compositional, Structural, and Functional Insights

Journal

MBIO
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01781-14

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R03 AI103295, R03AI103295] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE023510, R01DE023510] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among pathogenic fungi, Candida albicans is most frequently associated with biofilm formation, a lifestyle that is entirely different from the planktonic state. One of the distinguishing features of these biofilms is the presence of extracellular material, commonly referred to as the biofilm matrix. The fungal biofilm matrix embeds sessile cells within these communities and plays important structural and physiological functions, including antifungal drug resistance with important clinical repercussions. This matrix is mostly self-produced by the fungal cells themselves and is composed of different types of biopolymers. In C. albicans, the main components of the biofilm matrix are carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and DNA, but many of them remain unidentified and/or poorly characterized. In their recent article, Zarnowski et al. [mBio 5(4): e01333-14, 2014, doi: 10.1128/mBio.01333-14] used a variety of biochemical and state-of-the-art omic approaches (glycomics, proteomics, and lipidomics) to identify and characterize unique biopolymers present in the C. albicans biofilm matrix. Besides generating a true encyclopedic catalog of individual moieties from each of the different macromolecular categories, results also provide important insights into structural and functional aspects of the fungal biofilm matrix, particularly the interaction between different components and the contribution of multiple matrix constituents to biofilm antifungal drug resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available