4.5 Article

Does pre-operative chemoradiation for initially unresectable or borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma increase post-operative morbidity? A case-matched analysis

Journal

HPB
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 574-580

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/hpb.12033

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO)
  2. Association Francaise de Chirurgie Hepato-Biliaire et de Transplantation Hepatique (ACHBT)
  3. Nuovo-Soldati Foundation for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for locally unresectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer may allow some patients to a undergo a resection, but whether or not this increases post-operative morbidity remains unclear. Methods: The post-operative morbidity of 29 patients with initially locally unresectable/borderline pancreatic cancer who underwent a resection were compared with 29 patients with initially resectable tumours matched for age, gender, the presence of comorbidities (yes/no), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, tumour location (head/body-tail), procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy/distal pancreatectomy) and vascular resection (yes /no). Wilcoxon's signed ranks test was used for continuous variables and McNemar's chi-square test for categorical variables. Results: Compared with patients with initially resectable tumours, patients who underwent a resection after pre-operative chemoradiation therapy had similar rates of overall post-operative complications (55% versus 41%, P = 0.42), major complications (21% versus 21%, P = 1), pancreatic leaks and fistulae (7% versus 10%, P = 1) and mortality (0% versus 1.7%, P = 1). Conclusion: Although some previous studies have suggested differences in post-operative morbidity after chemoradiation, our case-matched analysis did not find statistical differences in surgical morbidity and mortality associated with pre-operative chemoradiation therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available