4.5 Article

Surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: experience improves resectability

Journal

HPB
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 142-149

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00419.x

Keywords

cholangiocarcinoma; Klatskin's tumour; resection; multivariate analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: In hilar cholangiocarcinoma, resection provides the only opportunity for longterm survival. A US experience of hilar cholangiocarcinoma was examined to determine the effect of clinical experience on negative margin (R0) resection rates. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 110 consecutive hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients presenting over an 18-year period. Analyses were performed using chi-squared, Wilcoxon rank sum and Kaplan-Meier methods, and multivariable Cox and logistic regression modelling. Results: Of the 110 patients in the cohort, 59.1% were male and 90.9% were White. The median patient age was 64 years. A total of 59 (53.6%) patients underwent resection; 37 of these demonstrated R0. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.1%; the complication rate was 39.0%. The rate of resectability increased over time (36.4% vs. 70.9%; P = 0.001), as did the percentage of R0 resections (10.9% vs. 56.5%; P < 0.001). Of the 59 patients who underwent resection, 23 (39.0%) experienced recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified resection margins [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.124 for positive vs. negative; P = 0.002] and type of operation (HR = 5.075 for exploration vs. resection; P = 0.001) as significant to survival. Conclusions: Although R0 resection can be achieved in only a minority of patients, these patients have a reasonable chance of longterm survival. The last decade has seen a significant rise in rates of resectability of Klatskin's tumour at specialty centres.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available