4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Protective effect of lipopolysaccharide preconditioning in hepatic ischaemia reperfusion injury

Journal

HPB
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 538-545

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00211.x

Keywords

liver; preconditioning; lipopolysaccharide; ischaemia/reperfusion; SOCS-1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Preconditioning using lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) ligand, has been demonstrated to reduce ischaemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) in some organs, but its effect in the liver has not been elucidated. We examined the liver protective mechanism and correlated signalling pathway of LPS preconditioning in mice. Methods: BALB/c and TLR4 mutant mice underwent 90 min of 70% hepatic ischaemia. Lipopolysaccharide (100 mu g/kg) was injected intraperitoneally 20 h or 30 min before ischaemia. Liver damage after reperfusion was examined using serum samples and liver specimens. To analyse the mechanism of preconditioning in detail, phosphorylation of representative signalling mediators to nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) activation, Akt and interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-1 (IRAK-1), and expression of a negative feedback inhibitor, suppressor of cytokine signalling-1 (SOCS-1), were evaluated by Western blotting. Results: Pretreatment with LPS only 20 h before ischaemia elicited a preconditioning effect; however, preconditioning was absent in TLR4 mutant mice. Lipopolysaccharide significantly decreased serum alanine aminotransferase, tumour necrosis factor-a, hepatocyte necrosis and NF-kappa B activity after reperfusion. Phosphorylated IRAK-1 was suppressed by LPS, whereas no difference was observed in phosphorylated Akt. Pre-ischaemic LPS provided early induction of SOCS-1. Discussion: Late-phase LPS preconditioning provided liver protection against IRI through the down-regulation of the TLR4 cascade derived from early induction of SOCS-1 during ischaemia/reperfusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available