4.5 Review

The effect of anti-VEGF drugs (bevacizumab and aflibercept) on the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

Journal

ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages 59-65

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S29719

Keywords

chemotherapy; tumors; antiangiogenic

Funding

  1. State Key Basic Research and Development Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB521704]
  2. National High-tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2006AA02A245]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81000894]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Projects [2009C13021, 2011C23087]
  5. Science Research Fund of Shaoxing [2011D10013]
  6. Science Research Fund of Zhuji [2011CC7874]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Significant progression has been achieved in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in recent years. This has been partly attributed to successfully incorporating new drugs into combination chemotherapy. In addition to the traditional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, molecularly targeted agents began to play an important role in the treatment of advanced solid tumors. To date, two classes of molecularly targeted agents have been approved for treatment of patients with mCRC: (1) antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents (such as bevacizumab and aflibercept) and (2) antiendothelial cell growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) agents (such as cetuximab and panitumumab). Aflibercept is a new member of anti-VEGF agents which has demonstrated efficacy for treatment of mCRC. With the commencement of clinical trials and basic research into aflibercept, more data from the bedside and the bench have been obtained. This review will outline the application of anti-VEGF agents by reviewing clinic experiences of bevacizumab and aflibercept, and try to add perspectives on the use of anti-VEGF agents in mCRC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available