Journal
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 26, Issue -, Pages 1620-1647Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.025
Keywords
Tight/shale gas condensate; History-matching; Forecasting; Analytical methods; Semi-analytical; Methods; Empirical methods
Categories
Funding
- BC Oil and Gas Commission
- Shell
- Encana
- Alberta Innovates Technologies Futures (AITF)
- TAQA North Ltd.
- Tight Oil Consortium (TOC)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The primary focus of the majority of current, and foreseeable, natural gas drilling within North America is low-permeability liquid-rich gas and gas condensate reservoirs, where the liquid fraction is now a major source of revenue. Development of these liquid-rich resources is aided by the use of multi-fractured horizontal wells (MFHWs), and is at an early stage; further research is required to appropriately manage the resource for optimal hydrocarbon recovery. The appropriate forecasting methodologies to apply to these tight liquid-rich plays are a focus of current research. While numerical simulation is the most rigorous forecasting methodology, practitioners have turned to simple analytical and empirical methods because of their ease-of-use and requirement of less data. However, these analytical and empirical approaches have limitations that limit their applicability for unconventional resevoirs with complex reservoir, hydraulic fracture and fluid properties. In this study, the workflow of Clarkson (2013b) is applied to address the limitations of existing empirical and analytical methods for forecasting MFHWs producing from liquid-rich tight gas/shale. The workflow calls for constraint of analytical models by linking inputs to rate-transient analysis-derived reservoir and hydraulic fracture properties, and constraining empirical model forecasts to be consistent with analytical model forecasts. In order to address the range in reservoir/fracture properties observed in shales, a suite of analytical models is proposed. Similarly, a suite of empirical methods is used, and the models yielding the most accurate matches to the analytical models are selected for forecasting. Lastly, in order to bridge the gap between analytical and empirical methods, the semi-analytical method introduced by Clarkson and Qanbari (2015), which has as its basis the contacted gas-in-place calculations of Agarwal (2010), is also used for forecasting. An important contribution of this work is the demonstration of the applicability of the analytical and semi-analytical models used in this work for tight gas/shale gas condensate MFHWs exhibiting multi-phase flow in the reservoir. As demonstrated in this study using simulation cases, constant condensate gas ratios can occur for tight/shale gas condensate wells exhibiting transient linear flow and flowing at near constant flowing bottomhole pressure, even for relatively rich gas cases, rendering the single-phase forecasting methods useful for forecasting gas and condensate phases. The accuracy of these methods is tested using simulated cases, and practicality of the workflow demonstrated using an actual field example of a liquid-rich shale MFHW. This study will be of interest to those petroleum engineers who are faced with forecasting a large number of liquid-rich shale wells, and desire methods that can be simply applied to constrain forecasts and improve accuracy. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available