4.3 Article

The Cenozoic structural evolution and its influences on gas accumulation in the Lishui Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages 107-118

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.11.024

Keywords

Structural evolution; Cenozoic; Gas accumulation; Lishui Sag; East China Sea Shelf Basin

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652013099]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41130422, 41030853]
  3. Liang Jiang and Laifu Fang at the China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC)
  4. Yanbin Wang at the Chinese University of Mining Technology (Beijing)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given the natural gas pools that have been discovered at the Lishui Sag, this region has great potential as a favorable prospecting area in the East China Sea Shelf Basin, which is a gas-rich basin in China. Well and seismic data, special geological techniques, including erosion history reconstruction, balanced cross-section restoration and basin modeling, were used to reconstruct the paleostructure. The major conclusions of the Cenozoic paleostructure reconstruction in Lishui Sag included the following: The Lishui Sag experienced a multi-period burial history, including rapid subsidence in the Paleocene, a transition during the Eocene and slow subsidence in the Neogene, and uplifting and erosion in the Paleogene Oujiang and Yuquan movements. The burial history can be summarized into four evolution stages, namely, rifting, post-rifting, uplift-inversion and regional subsidence. The rapid subsidence facilitated the hydrocarbon generation, and the uplift-inversion created a lot of traps in the central uplift area and facilitated the hydrocarbon migration, and regional subsidence facilitated the preservation of accumulated hydrocarbons. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available