4.3 Article

The advantages of microflow LC-MS/MS compared with conventional HPLC-MS/MS for the analysis of methotrexate from human plasma

Journal

BIOANALYSIS
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages 1387-1396

Publisher

FUTURE SCI LTD
DOI: 10.4155/BIO.13.73

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In support of bioanalysis, there has always been a desire to improve detection limits and reduce scale. Microflow LC (MFLC) coupled with MS accomplishes both of these goals. Results: As such, MFLC coupled with an MS system was used to generate bioanalytical validation data that met US FDA criteria. The MFLC-MS/MS data was compared with the same method with the use of conventional HPLC-MS/MS and a more than 14x S/N improvement was found with the MFLC-MS/MS method. Methotrexate was used as a model molecule to demonstrate the validation of the method from human plasma. The MFLC-MS/MS method was demonstrated to be accurate (+/- 7%) and precise (12.9% at the LLOQ and a maximum of 11.6% at all other concentrations) across the dynamic range of the assay (1-1000 ng/ml) and compared well with the HPLC-MS/MS method. The MFLC bioanalytical validation was performed at a flow rate of 35 mu l/min on a 0.5-mm inner diameter (I. D.) column, whereas, for the same linear velocities on the 2.0-mm I.D. column, the conventional HPLC bioanalytical validation was performed at 700 mu l/min. Since the flow rate of the MFLC system is 20-times less than the HPLC system, the consumable solvent and disposal cost to perform the MFLC validation was significantly less. Conclusion: MFLC-MS/MS can be used to perform bioanalytical method validations with increased MS signal, reduced source contamination and reduced solvent consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available