4.7 Article

The influence of the size and aspect ratio of anisotropic, porous CaCO3 particles on their uptake by cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12951-015-0111-7

Keywords

Calcium carbonate; Anisotropic; Uptake; Cells; Internalisation

Funding

  1. Marie-Curie foundation
  2. Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  3. LOEWE (project Synchembio)
  4. European Commission (project FutureNanoNeeds)
  5. EU FP-7-People-IRSES project 'DINaMIT'
  6. Government of the Russian Federation [14.Z50.31.0004]
  7. RFBR [15-29-01172]
  8. FWO (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek) Vlaanderen
  9. BOF (Bijzonder Onderzoekfonds, University of Ghent, Belgium)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent reports highlighting the role of particle geometry have suggested that anisotropy can affect the rate and the pathway of particle uptake by cells. Therefore, we investigate the internalization by cells of porous calcium carbonate particles with different shapes and anisotropies. Results: We report here on a new method of the synthesis of polyelectrolyte coated calcium carbonate particles whose geometry was controlled by varying the mixing speed and time, pH value of the reaction solution, and ratio of the interacting salts used for particle formation. Uptake of spherical, cuboidal, ellipsoidal (with two different sizes) polyelectrolyte coated calcium carbonate particles was studied in cervical carcinoma cells. Quantitative data were obtained from the analysis of confocal laser scanning microscopy images. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the number of internalized calcium carbonate particles depends on the aspect ratio of the particle, whereby elongated particles (higher aspect ratio) are internalized with a higher frequency than more spherical particles (lower aspect ratio). The total volume of internalized particles scales with the volume of the individual particles, in case equal amount of particles were added per cell.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available