4.3 Article

Self-aromatherapy massage of the abdomen for the reduction of menstrual pain and anxiety during menstruation in nurses: A placebo-controlled clinical trial

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages E165-E168

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2011.08.007

Keywords

Aromatherapy; Menstrual pain; Anxiety; Placebo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of self-aromatherapy massage on menstrual pain and anxiety. Participants and methods: The subjects were 63 female nurses who rated their menstrual pain >5 on a 10-point visual analogue scale. Subjects were non-randomly allocated into three groups: an experimental group (N = 26) who performed self-aromatherapy massage, a placebo group (N = 18), and a no-treatment control group (N = 19). Eleven participants dropped out of the study either because of nausea (experimental group, N = 1) or because they took medication during the trial (placebo group, N = 3; control group, N = 4). The final analysis included 25 in the experimental group, 15 in the placebo group, and 15 in the no-treatment control group. Menstrual pain and anxiety levels were assessed using a visual analogue scale, and we assessed the menstrual pain 4 times during a short time period. Results: The menstrual pain was significantly lower in the aromatherapy group than in the other two groups after 24 h. Using multiple regression analysis, the use of aromatherapy was found to be associated with the changes in menstrual pain levels (Beta = -1.74, 95% CI: -2.64 to -0.85, P < 0.001) and the level of anxiety (Beta = -0.53, 95% CI: -0.76 to -0.31, P = 0.001). Conclusion: These findings suggest that self-aromatherapy massage of the abdomen using topically applied essential oils may be an effective treatment that decreases menstrual pain and the level of anxiety. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available