4.6 Article

Healing process of venous ulcers: the role of microcirculation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 57-64

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00943.x

Keywords

capillaroscopy; chronic venous insufficiency; laser Doppler perfusion imaging; thermoregulatory microcirculation

Funding

  1. [MZ SR 2007/29-UK-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to describe adequately the process of healing in the intermediate degrees, we investigated microcirculatory changes in the venous ulcers at well-defined stages of wound repair. We investigated dynamic changes in microcirculation during the healing process of venous ulcers. Ten venous ulcers were investigated in three consecutive clinical stages of wound healing: non granulation tissue (NGTA), GTA and scar. Subpapillary microcirculation was measured by laser Doppler perfusion (LDP) imaging and expressed using LDP values in arbitrary units. Nutritive perfusion by capillary microscopy and expressed as capillary density (CD) the number of capillaries per square millimetre. Before the development of GTA the LDP was low (median 1.35; lowerupper quartiles 0.711.83) accompanied with zero CD in all but one patient who had a density of 1. With the first appearance of GTA in the same area, the LDP was improved (2.22; 1.122.33; P = 0.0024) when compared with NGTA, in combination with a significant increase in CD (1.75; 03; P = 0.0054). In scar, the LDP was similar to that in the NGTA (1.03; 0.771.83; P = 0.278), combined with the highest CD (5.75; 4.58) in comparison with the previous stages of the area (for both pairs, P < 0.0001). Venous ulcers are caused by poor nutritive and subpapillary perfusion. Subpapillary perfusion plays a major role in the formation of GTA. In a scar, the increased nutritive perfusion is sufficient to cover the blood supply and keep skin viable while subpapillary perfusion is low.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available